翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Room for Improvement (Australian TV series) ・ Room For Love ・ Room for more funding ・ Room for One More ・ Room for One More (film) ・ Room for One More (TV series) ・ Room for PlayStation Portable ・ Room for Squares ・ Room for the River (Netherlands) ・ Room for Two ・ Room for Two (Australian TV series) ・ Room for Two (TV series) ・ Room Full of Mirrors ・ Room Full of Roses ・ Room Girl ・ Room Hire v Jeppe Street Mansions ・ Room in Rome ・ Room in the House ・ Room in Your Heart ・ Room Key ・ Room modes ・ Room Nine ・ Room No. 103 ・ Room No. 382 ・ Room Noises ・ Room number ・ Room of Death ・ Room of Lights ・ Room of Mirrors ・ Room of One's Own Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Room Hire v Jeppe Street Mansions ： ウィキペディア英語版 Room Hire v Jeppe Street Mansions ''Room Hire Co (Pty) Ltd v Jeppe Street Mansions (Pty) Ltd''〔1949 (3) SA 1155 (T).〕 is an important case in South African law: the leading case, indeed, on disputes of fact. It was heard in the Transvaal Provincial Division on April 28 and 29, 1949, with judgement on July 15. Murray AJP, Ramsbottom J and Blackwell J presided. A. Shacksonvis KC (with him A. Mendelow) appeared for the appellant, and A. Suzman KC (with him MJ Hart) for the respondent. The appellant's attorneys were Schwartz & Goldblatt; the respondent's were Podlashuc, Meintjes, Liebson & Klagsbrun. The case was an appeal from a decision in the Witwatersrand Local Division by Neser J. Its significance lies in the area of civil procedure, with its determination that the court in application proceedings, where a material fact arises which cannot be resolved by ''viva voce'' evidence, may either direct the parties to trial or dismiss the application with costs. == Judgment == Ramsbottom J and Blackwell J concurred in the judgment of Murray AJP, who reiterated that, except in interlocutory matters, it is undesirable to attempt to settle disputes of fact solely on the probabilities disclosed in contradictory affidavits. Where no real dispute of fact exists, there is no reason for incurring the delay and expense involved in a trial action: Motion proceedings in such a case are generally recognised as permissible. Where a dispute of fact is shown to exist, however, the court has a discretion as to the future course of the proceedings. If the dispute of fact cannot properly be determined by ''viva voce'' evidence under Rule 9,〔The calling of evidence under this Rule rests with the court or judge, regardless of whether or not the parties request it. It is, in other words, solely in his discretion.〕 the parties may be sent to trial in the ordinary way (either on the affidavits as constituting the pleadings, or else with a direction that pleadings be filed); otherwise the application may be dismissed with costs. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Room Hire v Jeppe Street Mansions」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.